top of page

Differences between NBCC and ASCE 7 in Site Classifications and Soil Factors

The National Building Code of Canada (NBCC) and the American Society of Civil Engineers' ASCE 7 Standard are two widely adopted guidelines for seismic design. Both standards aim to ensure the safety and performance of structures during seismic events, considering the influence of local site conditions and soil factors. This article discusses the distinctions between NBCC and ASCE 7 in terms of site classifications and soil factors, focusing on the fundamental principles that guide the design and construction of structures.

Site Classifications

NBCC: The NBCC classifies sites into four categories (A, B, C, and D) based on the shear wave velocity (Vs) of the upper 30 meters of soil. These classifications provide a simplified representation of the site's soil conditions and their influence on the amplification of seismic ground motions.

ASCE 7: ASCE 7 classifies sites into six categories (A, B, C, D, E, and F) based on the average shear wave velocity (Vs30) of the upper 30 meters of soil. The additional site classes in ASCE 7 provide a more detailed representation of site conditions and their effects on seismic ground motion amplification.

Site Amplification Factors

NBCC: The NBCC provides site amplification factors for each site class, which are used to adjust the design ground motions to account for local site conditions. These amplification factors are based on the soil type and the period of the ground motion.

ASCE 7: ASCE 7 also provides site amplification factors for each site class, but these factors are derived from more extensive research and are based on both short-period (Fa) and mid-period (Fv) spectral acceleration parameters. This difference results in more accurate estimates of the influence of site conditions on ground motion amplification.

Site-Specific Ground Motion Analysis

NBCC: The NBCC requires site-specific ground motion analysis for sites with complex soil conditions or for structures with a high level of importance. This analysis can provide more accurate estimates of the design ground motions, accounting for the unique characteristics of the site's soil profile.

ASCE 7: ASCE 7 also requires site-specific ground motion analysis for sites with complex soil conditions or for structures with a high level of importance. However, the standard provides more detailed guidance on the application of site-specific analysis methods, including the use of nonlinear site response analysis techniques.

Soil-Structure Interaction

NBCC: The NBCC acknowledges the potential influence of soil-structure interaction (SSI) on the response of structures during seismic events, but it does not provide explicit requirements for considering SSI in the design process.

ASCE 7: ASCE 7 places greater emphasis on the consideration of soil-structure interaction in seismic design. The standard includes specific provisions for evaluating and accounting for SSI effects, ensuring that structures are designed to accommodate the influence of soil conditions on their dynamic response.

Conclusion

Understanding the differences between NBCC and ASCE 7 in site classifications and soil factors is crucial for engineers working on seismic design projects. The distinctions in site classifications, site amplification factors, site-specific ground motion analysis, and soil-structure interaction can significantly impact the design and performance of structures during seismic events. By recognizing these differences, engineers can select the most appropriate standard for their projects and ensure the safety and performance of structures in earthquake-prone regions.


Read more:



Located in Calgary, AlbertaVancouver, BCToronto, OntarioEdmonton, AlbertaHouston TexasTorrance, CaliforniaEl Segundo, CAManhattan Beach, CA; Concord, CA; We offer our engineering consultancy services across Canada and United States. Meena Rezkallah.

bottom of page